Assault weapons gun ban Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Assault weapons gun dislodge - Essay archetypeThe reason for which Jimmy Carter, along with George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, supported this law has to be analyzed. This law got passed in 1994 and expired in ten years. When the law was approaching expiration date various law organizations, including police chiefs and sheriffs, have demanded for its renewal. They called on the President of that time to renew and streng consequently the law. But with a sparkle from the purity House, protestors demand prevailed and the ban was terminated. Carter personally owned a lot of different types of gun which includes two handguns, quartet shotguns and three rifles, two with scopes (Carter, n.p.). He and his other friends cherished the ownership of the guns. He apply these guns for the purpose of lookup in his family woods and field and occasionally he too took his family along with his friends for hunting. He and his friend used to cultivate innovate ideas to do various things on the gun. He even used to display some of them in the white house. According to Carter, in case of hunting if one maintains safety there should not be any problem. But n all Carter nor his friends wanted to posses such an assault gun. Since they believed that the assault guns were used to either kill policemen or any other civilian. He believed that White House should not have granted up accentuateing to reinforce the law, even if there were lots of political difficulties. A lot of emotions were also attached with the ban of the Assault Weapons. The N.R.A. leaders were highly influenced by the firearm industry and they started believing that the firearms were world snatched away from them and the house owners were deprived of ways to protect themselves. He argues that the fire industry and other disposal authorities should reassess the safety and accountability and should enact the ban again. And if the politicians fear the disapproval of N.R.A during election then it was not at all a s olid reason (Carter, n.p.). The view of Wheeler should also be assessed in order to have clear understanding of the law. Wheeler has pointed some predictions by studying the psychological science of the criminals. He argues that assault guns were not used by the criminals because they were difficult to hide. The data of National Institute of arbitrator says that Assault Weapons were used in fewer than eight percent of gun crimes even before the ban (Wheeler, n.p.). Moreover the criminals were more inclined to use high quality hand gun. Handgun Epidemic with child(p) Plan (HELP Network) (Wheeler, n.p.) says that the end of the ban over the assault gun would lead to a wave of maturation crime. And that the root of all evils was the gun. But this belief had no basis. As the panic of the assault gun faded, the activists try to discover a new type of gun. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzeneggers desk lies a bill to ban .50 tone rifles (Wheeler, n.p.). That has resulted into the myth th at the terrorists used .50-caliber rifles and assault rifles were used by the criminals. But the reports actually suggested that .50 caliber was used by the criminals also. Wheeler also argues that Assault Weapon was deliberately misrepresented by the anti gunners as mold guns. In the year 2003 CNN showed a video of machine gun and